Adoma

Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.

Good Law
711 F. Supp. 2d 1142·2010 WL 1797263·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53974
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 2010CIV. S-10-0059 LKK/GGHCalifornia4,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Karlton, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff in this suit brings various claims for unpaid overtime wages against the University of Phoenix and Apollo Group, Inc., on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. Plaintiffs suit articulates four different theories of recovery: (1) a class action complaint brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), (b) (1), and (b)(3) alleging various violations of the California Labor Code; (2) a collective action complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”); (3) an individual action for retaliation and record production; and (4) a Private Attorney General Act claim for violations of the California Labor Code.

Defendants argue that they face similar unpaid overtime suits in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Central District of California. During the hearing on this motion, however, defendants represented that the allegedly similar suit in the Central District of California has reached a settlement awaiting court approval. Defendants here move to dismiss the FLSA claim under the first-to-file rule, or in the alternative, to stay and/or transfer the claim to the Central District of California. Defendants also move to stay plaintiffs state law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.