Jordon

IO Group, Inc. v. Jordon

Good Law
708 F. Supp. 2d 989·2010 WL 1541263·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47837
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 2010C 09-0884 MEJCalifornia7,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

James, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DKT. # 57)

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff IO Group, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Default Judgment, filed February 18, 2010. (Dkt. # 57.) Defendant Jason Jordon (“Defendant”) has not filed an opposition or otherwise appeared in this matter since the parties filed a joint status report on December 17, 2009. After consideration of the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs Motion as set forth below.

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is a California corporation doing business as “Titan Media,” with its principal place of business located in San Francisco, California. (Compl. ¶ 2, Dkt. # 1.) Titan Media produces, markets, and distributes adult entertainment products, including Internet website content, videos, DVDs, and photographs. Id. Plaintiff operates and maintains a website by and through which its photographic and audiovisual works can be viewed by individuals who pay a monthly subscription fee. Id. Prior to distribution, each of Plaintiffs audiovisual works is marked with Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.