Hernandez

Hernandez v. Harrington

Good Law
720 F. Supp. 2d 1161·2010 WL 2653343·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62237
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 21, 2010Case SACV 07-1096-DMG (RC)California4,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gee, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the second amended petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.

This Court finds an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation; thus, a certificate of appeal-ability should not issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2) and Fed. R.App. P. 22(b). Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483 , 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Mayfield v. Calderon, 229 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir.2000).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.