Saldate

Saldate v. Wilshire Credit Corp.

Good Law
711 F. Supp. 2d 1126·2010 WL 582069·268 F.R.D. 87
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 2010Case CV F 09-2089 LJO SMSCalifornia6,896 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Neill, J.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 18.)

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Wilshire Credit Corporation (“Wilshire”), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) and Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”) seek to dismiss as meritless, conclusory and time barred plaintiff George A. Saldate, Jr.’s (“Mr. Saldate’s”) statutory and common law claims arising from a “residential mortgage” for his Fresno property (“property”). Mr. Saldate filed no papers to oppose dismissal of claims against defendants. This Court considered defendants’ F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on the record and VACATES the February 24, 2010 hearing, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), (g). For the reasons discussed below, this Court DISMISSES this action against defendants.

BACKGROUND

Mr. Saldate’s Property Loan

On November 4, 2005, Mr. Saldate completed a loan for the property. The loan terms were memorialized in a promissory note which was secured by a deed of trust (“DOT”) on the property. The DOT was recorded on November 22, 2005 and identifies defendant WMC Mortgage Corp. (“WMC”) as lender, Westwood Associates as trustee, and MERS as beneficiary.

By a Corporate Assignment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.