Team Enterprises, LLC v. Western Investment Real Estate Trust

Good Law
721 F. Supp. 2d 898·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67033
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 2010Case CV F 08-0872 LJO SMSCalifornia5,517 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Neill, J.

ORDER ON MULTIMATIC’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS

(Doc. 288.)

INTRODUCTION

Defendant dry cleaning machine manufacturers Multimatic Corporation, Multimatic LLC, and The Kirrberg Corporation (collectively “Multimatic”) seek F.R.Civ.P. 12(c) judgment on plaintiff Team Enterprises, LLC (“Team’s”) hazardous substances clean up contribution claims on grounds that Team’s operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) lacks allegations to render Multimatic liable under federal and state law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 , et seq., and the Hazardous Substance Account Act (“HSAA”), California Health & Safety Code, §§ 25300-25395.45. Team responds that it “has sufficiently pled facts (or can plead additional facts) to constitute a plausible basis for liability.” This Court considered Multimatic’s motion for judgment on pleadings on the record without a hearing. For the reasons discussed below, this Court GRANTS Multimatic judgment on the pleadings on Team’s claims against Multimatic.

BACKGROUND

Summary

Team is a New Mexico limited liability company. Since March 1980, Team has leased a portion of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.