Joe Bradley Smith and Myron Parker v. United States

Good Law
291 F.2d 220·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4352
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 196117198California1,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Merrill, J.

This appeal is taken from conviction, of the crime commonly known as bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (b). It challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish two elements of the crime: (1) the taking and carrying away of property; (2) the victim’s lack of consent to-the taking.

The government’s principal witness was a teller at the Bank of Nevada at Las Vegas, Nevada. He testified that he had known both appellants; that Parker had been a fellow employee at the Bank of Nevada and that he had known Smith when both of them had worked at a Reno bank. The evidence leading up to the theft, as he related it, was as follows:

On the morning of March 31, 1958,, while he was driving to work, appellant Parker passed him in his automobile and signaled that he wished to talk with him. He stopped and Parker stopped behind', him. Parker came over to the teller’s, car, got in and they talked:

The teller agreed to that arrangement and then reported the matter to the bank manager. He was told to go ahead with the arrangements and that the proper authorities would be notified.

At the noon meeting appellant Smith was present. It was agreed that Smith would come to the teller’s window and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.