Nordyke

Nordyke v. King

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 761·27 Cal. 4th 875·44 P.3d 133
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 22, 2002S091549California3,169 words

Opinion

Opinion

We granted the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, for certification pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.5 to address the following question: Does state law regulating the possession of firearms and gun shows preempt a municipal ordinance prohibiting gun possession on county property? We conclude that the municipal ordinance in question, insofar as it concerns gun shows, is not preempted.

Other aspects of the ordinance may be partially preempted, but we need not address these aspects in this case.

The facts, as set forth by the Ninth Circuit and from our own review of the record, are as follows:

Plaintiffs Russell Allen Nordyke and Sallie Nordyke (doing business as TS Trade Shows) (the Nordykes) have been promoting gun shows at the Alameda County Fairgrounds (Fairgrounds) since 1991. The Fairgrounds are located on unincorporated county land in the City of Pleasanton and are managed by an independent nonprofit corporation, the Alameda County Fair Association (Fair Association), under an operating agreement with Alameda County. The exhibitors at the show include sellers of antique (pre 1898) firearms, modern firearms,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.