Marvin Miller AKA Marvin James Miller v. E. J. Oberhauser And/or R. W. Wood

OPINION AND ORDER.

Petitioner has filed a “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” consisting of thirty-eight pages. It is preceded by twenty-eight pages of a “preface,” and fifteen pages of “authorities.” It incorporates by reference the following:

Appendix A — What purports to be a true copy of a judgment of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino, entered in minutes on February 17, 1960, sentencing petitioner for arson.

Appendix B — What purports to be a true copy of a judgment of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, dated April 21, 1960, revoking petitioner’s probation previously granted on December 23, 1958, to his conviction based on pleas of guilty by petitioner to charges of grand theft (Sec. 487, subd. 1, Penal Code of California) and violation of Section 3020(a) of the Corporation Code of California.

Appendix C — A ninety-nine page “brief” and argument, containing five “Points”:

I. That the conviction was obtained by deceit, fraud, collusion, and perjury.

This discussion goes to the weight of the evidence and is replete with unsubstantiated conclusions, or misapprehensions…