San Diego Unified School District v. Commision on State Mandates

Caution
16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 466·2004 Cal. LEXIS 7079·2004 Daily Journal DAR 9404·33 Cal. 4th 859·94 P.3d 589
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2004S109125California12,804 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

Article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution provides: “Whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the State shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service . . . ,” (Hereafter article XIII B, section 6.)

Plaintiff San Diego Unified School District (District), like all other public school districts in the state, is, and was at the time relevant in this proceeding, governed by statutes that regulate the expulsion of students. (Ed. Code, § 48900 et seq.) Whenever an expulsion recommendation is made (and before a student may be expelled), the District is required by Education Code section 48918 to afford the student a hearing with various procedural protections— including notice of the hearing and the right to representation by counsel, preparation of findings of fact, notices related to any expulsion and the right of appeal, and preparation of a hearing record. Providing these procedural protections requires the District to expend funds, for which the District asserts a right to reimbursement from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.