SEMICONDUCTOR

Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR

Good Law
16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330·2004 Cal. LEXIS 6632·2004 D.A.R. 8890·2004 Daily Journal DAR 8890·94 P.3d 475
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2004S124914California71 words

Opinion

Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).

Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp., S123808 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.