Jesus Padilla Enriquez, Raul Franco v. United States

Good Law
293 F.2d 788·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 196117276California2,729 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Appellants were indicted in three counts (III, IV and VII) of a se.ven count indictment. Count III charged each with sale and Count IV the concealment of certain narcotics, each in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 and each occurring on August 2, 1960. Count VII charged each defendant and others with a conspiracy to sell and conceal the same narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 . The central figure in all seven counts was one Rosalio Hernandez Trigueros, Jr. In the conspiracy count it alleged the object thereof was that Trigueros would arrange to transfer heroin to prospective purchasers, and that the five remaining defendants would supply Trigueros with the needed heroin. The sole overt acts charged against defendants were:

(a) that on August 2, 1960, Enriquez drove coappellant Franco to a meeting where Franco met with codefendant Diaz;

(b) that on August 2, 1960, Enriquez and Franco met with defendant. Trigueros in a certain alley.

Prior to trial, defendants Ferrell and Trigueros pleaded guilty to Count I, and defendant Diaz pleaded guilty to Count VII. All defendants went to trial on the remaining counts. Defendant Rose Montez was acquitted; appellants and the other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.