Haughton v. Columbia River District Council No. 5

Good Law
294 F.2d 766·48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2922·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 196116746_1California1,335 words

Opinion

Opinion

294 F.2d 766 Laurence D. HAUGHTON and Maude Haughton, Copartners, doing business under the name and style of Elk Creek Logging Company, Appellants, v. COLUMBIA RIVER DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 5, INTERNATIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 5-40, International Woodworkers of America, Appellees. No. 16746. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 7, 1961. 1 Manley B. Strayer, James P. Rogers, Frederick A. Morgan and Hart, Rockwood, Davies, Biggs & Strayer, Portland, Or., for appellants. 2 Green, Richardson, Green & Griswold, Portland, Or., for appellees. 3 Before STEPHENS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge. 4 BOWEN, District Judge. 5 For several years prior to 1958, appellants Laurence D. Haughton and his wife, Maude, had been and at all times material to this action were copartners doing a private contract logging business in Clackamas County, Oregon, under the firm name of Elk Creek Logging Company (hereinafter called Elk Creek). The appellees are the local Union (hereinafter called the Union) and the District Council of the International Woodworkers of America. Elk Creek had a collective bargaining agreement with the Union, and also had a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.