National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local Union No. 324

Good Law
296 F.2d 48·49 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2053·1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3418
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 196117013_1California868 words

Opinion

Opinion

296 F.2d 48 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 324, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. 17013. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Earle W. Putnam, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf, by Lewis K. Scott, Portland, Or., amicus curiae. Carney & McCarroll, Richard R. Carney, Portland, Or., for respondent. 1 Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, District Judge. 2 WOLLENBERG, District Judge. 3 This case is a companion to our decision in N. L. R. B. v. Cascade Employers Association, 296 F.2d 42 (9th Cir., October 20, 1961, No. 17012.) 4 On May 18, 1959, the N. L. R. B. filed an unfair labor practice charge against respondent, alleging a violation of Section 8(b), subsections (1) (B) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act [ 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (b) (1) (B); § 158(b) (3)]. Complaint and Notice of Hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.