Henwood v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Good Law
298 F.2d 641·1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 6182
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 196217591California1,224 words

Opinion

Opinion

298 F.2d 641 Stanley E. HENWOOD, Richard I. Roemer, Lewis M. Poe, individually, as members of the United Industrial Corporation Stockholders' Protective Committee and as proxies of said Committee, James V. Armogida, Robert G. Ballance, Fred A. Beshara, Nathaniel R. Dumont, Joe L. Foss, William D. Lawry, Elmer M. Luther, Jr., Edward H. McLaughlin, Charles Soderstrom, John A. Steel, Clarence L. Summers, Roy L. Williams, Louis W. Wulfekuhler, Alfred T. Zodda, individually and as members of the United Industrial Corporation Stockholders' Protective Committee, Bernard F. Gira and Herbert J. Petersen, and United Industrial Corporation, a corporation, Defendants and Appellants, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Appellee, and UnitedIndustrial Corporation, Defendant and Appellee. No. 17591. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Jan. 17, 1962. Vaughan, Brandlin, Baggot, Robinson & Roemer, Mark P. Robinson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants Stockholders' Pro. Com. Kendrick, Schramm & Stolzy, Elwood S. Kendrick, John P. Scholl, Jack Corinblit, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants Gira & Peterson. Peter A. Dammann, Gen. Counsel, Walter P. North, Asst. Gen.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.