Bauer

Bauer v. Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.

Good Law
255 F. Supp. 2d 1086·2003 WL 1786879·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5202
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2003C-02-2406 EDLCalifornia4,879 words

Opinion

Opinion

Laporte, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

In this action for intentional interference with contract and unfair competition, brought by plaintiff Francis G. Bauer (“Bauer”) against defendants The Inter-public Group of Companies, Inc. (“IPG”), The Partnership, Octagon Football, and Octagon Marketing and Athlete Representation, Inc. (“Octagon”), defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

In this action, Bauer alleges that defendants interfered with his contract with National Football League (“NFL”) player David Carr (“Carr”). Bauer contends that defendants unlawfully convinced Carr to terminate his contract with Bauer and sign with defendants instead.

Bauer is a contract advisor, commonly referred to as an agent, with the National Football League Players Association. (Bauer Decl. ¶ 2.) He has been an agent for more than 20 years, and provides agency services in the form of contract negotiations, sports career counseling, job placement, and related services to professional football players. (Bauer Decl. ¶ 2.)

For the 2001 college football season, Carr was quarterback for Fresno…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.