Lonberg

Lonberg v. City of Riverside

Good Law
300 F. Supp. 2d 942·2004 WL 194077·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1102
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2004ED CV 97-237 RTCalifornia4,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered defendant City of Riverside (the “City”)’s motions (the “Motions”) for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (“Rule 56”), Plaintiff John Lonberg (“Plaintiff’)’s oppositions, and the City’s replies.

The City filed two motions. One motion is for partial summary judgment on the issue whether Plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to multiple statutory damages under California Civil Code, Section 54.3 (“Section 54.3”) based on a single course of allegedly discriminatory conduct. The second motion is for partial summary judgment on the question whether Plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to an award of damages against City under the Second Claim of the Complaint for violations of Civil Code, Section 54, et seq., since the California Tort Claims Act (“CTCA”) provides City immunity from claims for damages and because Plaintiff cannot establish intentional conduct in violation of Section 54.3. The Court concludes as follows:

I.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed a complaint in this court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.