National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Associated Newspapers, a Corporation D/B/A South Bay Daily Breeze

Good Law
299 F.2d 677
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 196217310_1California1,284 words

Opinion

Opinion

Merrill, J.

This case is before the court on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against respondent on February 9, 1961, pursuant to § 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.

The asserted unfair labor practice upon which the order is based occurred in December, 1959, in Redondo Beach, California, where respondent is engaged in the publication of a newspaper. The board found that respondent, in violation of § 8(a) (1) and (3) of the act, questioned employee David Clark about his union membership and thereafter subjected him to discrimination in an effort to impede or delay union organization of its mail room. It ordered that respondent cease and desist from the acts in question, offer reinstatement to Clark and make him whole for any loss of pay suffered.

Respondent contends that the record demonstrates, first, that there was in fact no discrimination and, second, that there was in fact no discouragement of union membership.

The charging party, David Clark, was, in December, 1959, employed by respondent as a fly-boy. His duties consisted of taking newspapers from the press conveyor to the mail room and there preparing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.