Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker v. George Weigel, Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company v. Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano and Rudolph A. Oetker

Caution
299 F.2d 897·1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5951
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 196217178_1California3,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

299 F.2d 897 PARTENWEEDEREI, MS BELGRANO, and Rudolph A. Oetker, Appellants, v. George WEIGEL, Appellee. BRADY-HAMILTON STEVEDORE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARTENWEEDEREI, MS BELGRANO and Rudolph A. Oetker, Appellees. No. 17178. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 8, 1962. Gray, Fredrickson & Heath, Nathan J. Heath, Portland, Or., for appellant Brady-Hamilton. Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser & Brooke; Erskine B. Wood, Portland, Or., for appellant Partenweederei, Pozzi, Levin & Wilson, Frank Pozzi, Philip A. Levin, Portland, Or., for appellee Weigel. Before JERTBERG, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. 1 George Weigel, libelant below, and appellee here, hereinafter called 'libelant,' was an employee of Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company, hereinafter called 'Stevedore,' and acting within the course and scope of his employment when he was struck by a boom of the vessel BELGRANO, as he was operating a tractor in reverse motion and pulling with a towline a railroad car, then loaded with lumber, upon a permanently fixed railroad spurline on the dock along shipside for the purpose of placing the limber under and within reach of the vessel's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.