Sawyer v. Pioneer Mill Company, Ltd.

Good Law
300 F.2d 200
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 196217223_1California1,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

300 F.2d 200 Harriet B. SAWYER, Appellant, v. PIONEER MILL COMPANY, Ltd., a corporation, C. H. Smith, H. C. Eichelberger, J. E. Ednie, H. A. Walker, Jr., M. A. Pietschman, F. W. Broadbent, Howard Butcher, III, J. Russell Cades, L. S. Dillingham, J. J. Jepson, R. R. Midkiff, H. V. von Holt, Appellees. No. 17223. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. March 14, 1962. Kenney, Morris & Ibanez, Robert W. Kenny, Los Angeles, Cal., Bouslog & Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant. J. Russell Cades, Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, Honolulu, Hawaii, Marion B. Plant, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, for appellees. Walter P. North, Gen. Counsel, David Ferber, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard M. Phillips, Attorney, S. E. C., Washington, D. C., for Securities & Exchange Com., amici curiae. Before CHAMBERS, BARNES, HAMLEY, HAMLIN, JERTBERG, MERRILL, KOELSCH, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. 1 There are before us an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint and a motion to dismiss the appeal. We have concluded that the motion should be granted. 2 Jurisdiction below was predicated upon Sections 14(a) and 10 of the Securities and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.