Herndon

United States v. Herndon

Good Law
546 F. Supp. 2d 854·2008 WL 822208·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29566
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2008Cr. S-02-0099 JFMCalifornia1,346 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moulds, J.

ORDER

Plaintiffs motion for probation revocation came on regularly for hearing October 4, 2007. Joseph M. Cook, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared for plaintiff. Linda Harter, Assistant Federal Defender, appeared for defendant. The court ordered further briefing, which has now been submitted. Upon review of the motion and the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendant was convicted of theft of government property, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and on August 22, 2002, was sentenced to a term of 60 months supervised probation. On December 22, 2006, the defendant’s sentence was modified to allow court probation in lieu of supervised probation. On August 1, 2007, the government filed a probation revocation petition. On August 15, 2007, the defendant was ordered to appear and show cause why probation should not be revoked. On Au gust 22, 2007, defendant’s five year probation term expired. On October 4, 2007, the matter was heard and defendant moved to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant argued that plaintiffs petition was not under oath or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.