People v. Williams

In People v. Tassell (1984) 36 Cal.3d 77 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 567 , 679 P.2d 1 ( Tassell ), this court held that when imposing a determinate sentence on a recidivist offender convicted of multiple offenses, a trial court is to impose an enhancement for a prior conviction only once to increase the aggregate term, and not separately to increase the principal or subordinate term imposed for each new offense. [1] ( Tassell, at pp. 89-92, 201 Cal.Rptr. 567 , 679 P.2d 1 .) Here, the Court of Appeal concluded that Tassell's holding does not apply to multiple indeterminate third strike sentences imposed under the "Three Strikes and You're Out Law" (Pen.Code, §§ 667, subds.(b)-(i), 1170.12, hereafter the Three Strikes law). [2] We agree that Tassell is not controlling in this different context, and that a prior conviction enhancement may be added to the third strike sentence for each new offense.

A jury convicted defendant Anthony Maurice Williams of forcible rape in concert (§§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible oral copulation in concert (§ 288a, subd. (d)), and forcible sodomy in concert (§ 286, subd. (d)), and it found that he had suffered two prior convictions for serious or…