Werner

Werner v. Quintus Corp.

Good Law

148 F. Supp. 2d 965·2001 WL 709183·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19337

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 2001C-00-4263 VRW, C-00-4264 VRW, C-00-4274 VRW, C-00-4276 VRW, C-00-4300 VRW, C-00-4308 VRW, C-00-4313 VRW, C-00-4343 VRW, C-00-4346 VRW, C-00-4381 VRW, C-00-4390 VRW, C-00-4392 VRW, C-00-4504 VRW, C-00-4528 VRW, C-00-4650 VRW, C-00-4678 VRW, C-00-4771 VRW, C-01-0093 VRW, C-01-0096 VRW, C-01-0262 VRW, C-01-0270 VRW, C-01-0932 VRW, C-01-20176 PVTCalifornia737 words

Opinion

Walker, J.

ORDER

Before the court are two motions to consolidate (Docs # 8-3 & 18-1). At the March 8, 2001, hearing the parties agreed that these cases should be consolidated. The court agrees. The complaints allege common questions of law and fact. Consolidation under FRCP 42(a) is appropriate.

The following actions are consolidated for all purposes, including, but not limited to, discovery, pretrial proceedings and trial proceedings pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

ABBREVIATED CASE NAME CASE NUMBER DATE FILED

Werner v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4263-VRW 11/15/

Weiss v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4264-VRW 11/15/

Lemieux v Quintus Corp, et al C-00h1274-VRW 11/16/

ABBREVIATED CASE NAME CASE NUMBER DATE FILED

Civic v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4276-VR W 11/16/

Tuopshug v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4294-VRW 11/16/

Fershteyn v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4300-VRW 11/16/

Alves v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4308-VRW 11/17/

Kaplowitz v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4313-VRW 11/17/

O’Neil v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4343-VRW 11/20/

Khalil v Quintus Corp, et al C-0ÍM346-VRW 11/20/

Tick v Quintus Corp, et al C-00-4381-VRW 11/22/

Zanowiak v Quintus Corp,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.