Hamilton

Hamilton v. Ayers

Good Law
458 F. Supp. 2d 1075·2006 WL 3114258·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94773
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2006CIV. F-90-363-OWWPCalifornia37,898 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

Final Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Granting in Part Certifí-cate of Appealability

Petitioner Michael Allen Hamilton (“Hamilton”) first appeared in federal court June 12, 1990, requesting a stay of execution and appointment of counsel. Hamilton filed his petition for writ of habe-as corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 December 3, 1991, and amended his petition January 11, 1993. Hamilton was ordered to exhaust state remedies March 18, 1993, and his second state habeas petition was filed in July, 1994. After informal briefing, the California Supreme Court issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) on July 17, 1996, addressing issues of juror bias and misconduct. The matter was referred to the trial court, a referee was appointed, and an evidentiary hearing was held November 4 and 5, 1997. The California Supreme Court discharged the OSC and denied the petition May 6, 1999, holding the evidence did not show the juror’s failure to fully disclose her pretrial knowledge and opinions about the case resulted in the seating of a biased juror since her omissions were inadvertent, and her contemplation of her deceased uncle did not bear on her ability to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.