Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express, Pensick & Gordon, Inc., a California Corporation v. California Motor Express, Limited, a Corporation

302 F.2d 391 PENSICK & GORDON, INC., Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS et al., Appellees. PENSICK & GORDON, INC., a California corporation, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS, LIMITED, a corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 17235. No. 17380. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. April 13, 1962. 1 Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Carl M. Gould, M. B. Jackson and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. 2 Catlin & Catlin, by Frank D. Catlin and George L. Catlin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Universal Carloading & Distributing Co., Inc., et al. 3 Donald Murchison, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee T. I. M. E. Freight, Inc. 4 Loeb & Loeb, Harry J. Keaton and Robert A. Holtzman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Pacific Intermountain Express & Consolidated Freightways. 5 Russell & Schureman and Theodore W. Russell, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Motor Express, Ltd., et al. 6 Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge. 7 PENCE, District Judge. 8 This is an action for money damages brought by shipper against several motor common carrier defendants. The shipper (Appellant), in its original complaint (App. No.…