In Re Silverton

Good Law
2005 Cal. LEXIS 6848·2005 Daily Journal DAR 7579·29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 766·36 Cal. 4th 81·113 P.3d 556
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 23, 2005S123042California5,639 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baxter, J.

In 1975, this court ordered petitioner Ronald Robert Silverton disbarred based on his felony convictions for conspiracy to obtain money by false pretenses and to present a fraudulent insurance claim as well as for soliciting another to commit or join in the commission of grand theft. (In re Silverton (1975) 14 Cal.3d 517, 519 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 596 , 535 P.2d 724 ].) After three unsuccessful applications, petitioner was reinstated as a member of the State Bar on October 6, 1992. Less than two years later, he began a series of client transactions that became the subject of another disciplinary proceeding charging violations of rules 3-300 and 4-200 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Review Department of the State Bar Court (Review Department) ultimately concluded that petitioner violated rule 4-200 with respect to three matters and violated rule 3-300 with respect to one other matter and recommended that petitioner be placed on two years’ stayed suspension and three years’ probation with various conditions, including a 60-day period of actual suspension.

In determining the appropriate level of discipline to recommend to this court, the Review Department considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.