Wilson

People v. Wilson

Bad Law
2008 Cal. LEXIS 9277·44 Cal. 4th 758·80 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211·187 P.3d 1041
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2008S089623California31,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

A jury in Riverside County Superior Court convicted Lester Harland Wilson in 2000 of the first degree murder of Uwe Durbin (Pen. Code, § 187; all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated) and of having personally used a firearm in the commission of the murder (§ 12022.5). It also convicted him of two counts of forcible rape (§261, subd. (a)(2)) and sustained two allegations that he used a firearm while committing these latter crimes (§ 12022.5). The jury also sustained special circumstance allegations that Wilson committed the murder while engaged in the commission of a kidnapping (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(B)) and that the murder involved the intentional infliction of torture (id., subd. (a)(18)). On March 14, 2000, the jury set the penalty at death under the 1978 death penalty law. (§ 190.1 et seq.) This appeal is automatic. (§ 1239, subd. (b).)

We affirm the judgment of guilt but, as explained below, the erroneous excusal during the penalty phase deliberations of the sole juror holding out for a life sentence requires that we reverse the penalty judgment.

I. Guilt Phase Facts

A. Prelude

Defendant Lester Wilson lived in Riverside with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.