O'NEILL

City of Sausalito v. O'NEILL

Good Law
211 F. Supp. 2d 1175·2002 WL 1460218·32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20825·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12322
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 2002C-01-01819 EDLCalifornia15,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

Laporte, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

In October 1999, Defendant. National Park Service issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement addressing the plan for the future use of Fort Baker. A former military base, Fort Baker is situated a few miles to the south and west of the City of Sausalito, California, near the north end of the Golden Gate Bridge. The Final Environmental Impact Statement focuses on new uses for historic buildings at Fort Baker, expansion of the Bay Area Discovery Museum, visitor recreation and the protection, restoration and maintenance of natural areas.

On May 10, 2001, Plaintiff City of Sau-salito filed this action, concerned that the plan selected would entail excessive development, including a large hotel and conference center, that would increase traffic and otherwise negatively effect the City. Specifically, the City alleges that the Final Environmental Impact Statement is unlawful and violates the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347 , the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544 , the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-712 , the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.