Moore

HIGH SIERRA HIKERS ASS'N v. Moore

Good Law
561 F. Supp. 2d 1107·2008 WL 2025012·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79134
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 2008C-00-01239 EDLCalifornia3,889 words

Opinion

Opinion

LaPORTE, J.

ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

On April 10, 2000, Plaintiffs High Sierra Hikers Association, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief against Defendants Bradley Powell, et al. (“Defendants”) , alleging violations of the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600-1687 , the Wilderness Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1131-1136 , the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 -4370d and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 arising from the Forest Service’s allowance of special use permits for commercial packstock operations in the Ansel Adams and John Muir Wilderness areas. On June 5, 2001, the Court issued an order regarding the merits of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and on January 9, 2002, after further briefing, issued an order granting injunctive relief. Both sides appealed.

On December 1, 2004, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision affirming the Court’s ruling that the Forest Service violated NEPA and the Court’s order of injunctive relief. See High Sierra Hikers Ass’n v. Blackwell, 390 F.3d 630 (9th Cir.2004). The Ninth Circuit reversed the Court’s grant of summary judgment in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.