Mary Schaaff Greear v. James N. Greear, Also Known as James N. Greear, Jr., (Two Cases). Mary Schaaff Greear v. James N. Greear, Also Known as James N. Greear, Jr., and Margaret Sperry Greear

Good Law
303 F.2d 893
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 196217272-17274_1California1,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

303 F.2d 893 Mary Schaaff GREEAR, Appellant, v. James N. GREEAR, also known as James N. Greear, Jr., Appellee (two cases). Mary Schaaff GREEAR, Appellant, v. James N. GREEAR, also known as James N. Greear, Jr., and Margaret Sperry Greear, Appellees. Nos. 17272-17274. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 31, 1962, Rehearing Denied July 31, 1962. Arthur J. Hilland, Ferdinand J. Mack, and James E. Hogan, Washington, D.C., and Cameron M. Batjer, Carson City, Nev., for appellant. Vargas, Dillon & Bartlett, Reno, Nev., for appellee. Before HAMLIN and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and WALSH, District Judge. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. 1 Appeals in three diversity cases are here consolidated for our decision. The question presented is whether under Navada law community property of a husband and wife to the extent of the husband's earnings is subject to the husband's contractual obligation to pay specified sums for the support of his former wife and the issue of his former marriage. We hold that it is. 2 In 1950, appellee, Dr. James Greear, obtained a Nevada divorce from appellant. The latter, a resident of the District of Columbia, did not appear in the suit and the court obtained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.