Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.

Good Law
684 F. Supp. 2d 1206·2010 WL 529456·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16702
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2010CIV. 2:03-1329 WBS EFBCalifornia1,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shubb, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR LIMITED PURPOSE OF STAYING THIS ACTION, AND TO STAY ACTION RELATING TO ELANTEC’S PRODUCTS

This case was stayed on September 20, 2004, with respect to claims and counterclaims relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,486,-869 (the “ '869” patent) and 5,754,250 (the “ '250” patent) until the patent reissue proceedings for those patents were complete. (Docket No. 50.) On October 2, 2009, the court granted defendant Thomson, Inc.’s (“Thomson”) unopposed motion to lift the stay. (Docket No. 225.) Elan-tee Semiconductor, Inc. (“Elantec”) and Intersil Corporation (“Intersil”) now move to intervene for the limited purpose of further staying the action pending resolution of a state court action with respect to patent infringement claims that involve Elantec’s products. In its Statement of Non-Opposition, Thomson states it does not oppose movants’ motion and that it agrees to be bound by the outcomes of the License Litigation and Declaratory Judgment Action (Def. Statement of Non-Opp’n to Mot. Intervene & Stay). In considering movants’ motion, therefore, the court will treat it as if it had been joined in by Thomson.

A. Motion To Intervene

Movants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.