Cummins, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
2005 Cal. LEXIS 7605·2005 Daily Journal DAR 8551·30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 823·36 Cal. 4th 478·115 P.3d 98
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2005S117726California5,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (hereafter sometimes referred to as the Act), Civil Code section 1791 et seq., provides that if a manufacturer or its representative in this state fails to repair a new motor vehicle to conform to any express warranty after a reasonable number of attempts to repair, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle or pay restitution. (§ 1793.2, subd. (d)(2).) The question presented in this case is whether a buyer who resides in California may bring suit against a manufacturer under the Act when the buyer purchased the vehicle in another state, but brought the vehicle for repair to the manufacturer’s authorized repair facility in California, and repeated attempts to repair the vehicle proved unsuccessful. We conclude that the Act does not apply unless the vehicle was purchased in California.

I.

During a visit to Idaho, plaintiffs Edward and Saudi Cox, who are California residents, purchased a motor home manufactured by defendant Winnebago Industries, Inc. and equipped with an engine made by defendant Cummins, Inc. Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Riverside County Superior Court against defendants, alleging that the motor home did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.