Hyde

Hyde v. Hartford

Good Law
643 F. Supp. 2d 1184·2009 WL 305560·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9620
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 2009CV 07-2017 PA (CWx)California3,198 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This is an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action for recovery of long-term disability benefits. Plaintiff Beverly Hyde (“Plaintiff’) seeks benefits under a group insurance policy (the “Policy”) issued to Time Warner Inc. and its participating subsidiaries, including Warner Bros., by Hartford Life Insurance Company (“Hartford”). On November 10, 2008, following the filing of the Administrative Record and briefing by the parties, the Court, sitting without a jury, conducted a bench trial. Having considered the materials submitted by the parties and reviewed the evidence, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a):

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff was employed as an executive secretary at Warner Bros, until August 1998. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 721.) In April 1999, she submitted a claim for long term disability benefits as a result of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (“CTS”). (AR 721-27.) As part of her claim, Plaintiffs employer prepared an “Employer’s Statement” which requested information concerning the physical aspects of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.