Snyder

Snyder v. San Diego Flowers

Bad Law
21 F. Supp. 2d 1207·98 Daily Journal DAR 12511·1998 WL 661220·8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1050·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14967
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1998CIV. 98-0781-B (AJB)California2,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE FOR 60 DAYS AND RETAINING SAN DIEGO FLOWERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SUBMISSION

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 24, 1998, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging discrimination in access to public accommodations in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. ,§§ 12101 et seq. (ADA), in addition to several supplemental state law causes of action. Defendant San Diego Flowers (SDF) now moves to dismiss for want of subject matter- jurisdiction and failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6), respectively. Upon due consideration of the moving and responding papers and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES SDF’s motion to dismiss.

II. BACKGROUND

The following factual allegations are set forth in the complaint. Bernard Snyder (Plaintiff) has a mobility impairment that requires him to use a wheelchair. On or about August 23, 1997, Plaintiff attempted to visit several adjacent public businesses: San Diego Flowers, Village Square Liquor & Deli, and Terrance R. Caster Trust (Defendants). Plaintiff alleges that he could not access any of these businesses because they have not complied with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.