Grenell

Grenell v. UPS Health and Welfare Package

Good Law
390 F. Supp. 2d 932·2005 WL 2100966
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 29, 2005CV 04-10375 JFW(CTX)California2,044 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walter, J.

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) [filed 04/06/05; Docket No. 20]

On April 6, 2005, Defendants The UPS Health and Welfare Package and United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). On April 18, 2005, Plaintiff filed his Opposition. On April 25, 2005, Defendants filed a Reply, Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for May 2, 2005 is hereby vacated, and the matter taken off calendar. After considering the moving, opposing, and reply papers and the arguments therein, the Court rules as follows:

1. Factual Background

Plaintiff was employed by Defendant United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (“UPS”) as a driver. As a UPS employee, Plaintiff was covered by UPS’ Health and Welfare Package (the “Plan”), which provided Plaintiff with short-term and long-term disability insurance, among other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.