Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Good Law
390 F. Supp. 2d 936·2005 WL 2488716·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12510
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 15, 2005EDCV03-887 RT(SGLX), EDCV04-333RT (SGLX)California7,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 56; (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT AMPHAS-TAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY BASED ON INDEFINITENESS; AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY BASED ON 35 U.S.C. § 102 .

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered defendant Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amphastar”)’s motion for summary judgment for inequitable conduct pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 (“Rule 56”), plaintiffs Aventis Pharma S.A. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Aventis”)’ opposition, and Amphastar’s reply. Based on such consideration, the court concludes as follows:

I.

BACKGROUND

Aventis is a pharmaceutical company that manufactures Lovenox. Lovenox is a blood thinner that inhibits the formation of certain venous blood clots called thromboses. Lovenox is derived from heparin. Heparin is a mixture of long polysaccharide molecules obtained from the internal organs of animals such as pigs and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.