At & T Communications of California, Inc. v. Pacific Bell

Good Law
60 F. Supp. 2d 997·1999 WL 613318·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12623
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 1999C-98-4368-CALCalifornia2,660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Legge, J.

ORDER: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD

Plaintiff AT & T Communications of California brings this action, and makes the present motion, to confirm an arbitration award in its favor against defendant Pacific Bell. Plaintiff asks this court to: confirm the award on the issue of liability, compel defendant to proceed with arbitration of damages, and enjoin defendant from proceeding before the California Public Utilities Commission.

Defendant moves to dismiss on two grounds. First, Pacific Bell asserts that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Second, Pacific Bell asserts that the arbitration award is not final and cannot be confirmed by this court because it is interlocutory only.

The pending motions have been briefed, argued and submitted for decision. The court has reviewed the moving and opposing papers, the record of the case and the applicable authorities. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies plaintiffs motion and grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.

I.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into an Interconnection Agreement in December 1996, pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.