James Lundgren, Dba Pacific Construction Company v. Claude Freeman, Sydney B. Hayslip and Stewart Tuft, Co-Partners, Dba Freeman, Hayslip and Tuft, School District No. 5 v. James Lundgren, Dba Pacific Construction Company

Good Law
307 F.2d 104·6 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 945·1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4673
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 196217232_1California8,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

307 F.2d 104 James LUNDGREN, dba Pacific Construction Company, Appellant, v. Claude FREEMAN, Sydney B. Hayslip and Stewart Tuft, Co-partners, dba Freeman, Hayslip and Tuft, Appellees. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, Appellant, v. James LUNDGREN, dba Pacific Construction Company, Appellee. No. 17232. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 27, 1962. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Reinhardt, Coblens & Stoll and Justin N. Reinhardt, Portland, Or., for appellant Lundgren. Banta, Silven, Horton & Young and David C. Silven, Baker, Or., for appellant School Dist. No. 5. Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf, Oglesby H. Young, and James H. Clarke, Portland, Or., for appellees. Before JERTBERG, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. 1 Lundgren, a building contractor, appeals from an order and a summary judgment, and School District No. 5 of Baker, Oregon, ("school district") appeals from two judgments, in an action brought by Lundgren against school district and the architectural firm of Freeman, Hayslip and Tuft ("architects"). We are affirming as to all matters appealed, except the time as of which interest is allowed, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.