Kirkeby

Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange County

Good Law
15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805·2004 Cal. LEXIS 6631·2004 Daily Journal DAR 8917·33 Cal. 4th 642·93 P.3d 395
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2004S117640California3,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

In this case, we consider whether a fraudulent conveyance claim affects title to or the right to possession of specific real property and therefore supports the recording of a notice of pendency of action— commonly referred to as a lis pendens. We conclude that it does.

Facts

FasTags, Inc., (FasTags) is a manufacturer and wholesale seller of identification tags for pets. Petitioner Cynthia Kirkeby and her brother Frederick W. Fascenelli developed the idea for the tags and jointly hold the patent for the manufacturing processes. Frederick and his wife Diana Fascenelli (hereafter the Fascenellis) hold 51 percent of the outstanding stock in FasTags, and Kirkeby owns 39 percent. The remaining 10 percent of FasTags’ outstanding stock is held by the FasTags Stock Trust, of which Kirkeby is the trustee.

After Kirkeby resigned from the FasTags board of directors in 1998, she alleged the Fascenellis looted the company. According to Kirkeby, the Fascenellis caused FasTags to execute improper patent licenses to increase their own salaries and bonuses, to pay their personal expenses, and to make improper loans. The Fascenellis allegedly prevented Kirkeby from seeking corporate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.