Crossdale

People v. Crossdale

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 686·2002 Cal. LEXIS 617·2002 Daily Journal DAR 1969·27 Cal. 4th 408·39 P.3d 1115
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 2002S097222California1,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

The issue in this case is whether a first offense for Penal Code section 502.7, subdivision (a) (section 502.7(a)) can be punished as a felony if the amount of the loss does not exceed $400. The Court of Appeal concluded section 502.7(a) incorporates the grand theft loss provision of section 487, subdivision (a), and therefore reduced the offense to a misdemeanor and remanded for resentencing. We disagree, and therefore reverse the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

The underlying facts are undisputed and largely immaterial to this question of statutory interpretation. We therefore adopt our statement of facts from that of the Court of Appeal.

Defendant Alfonso Cortez Crossdale was convicted by a jury of one count of obtaining telephone services by fraud (§ 502.7(a)), one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)), three counts of receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)), 18 counts of possessing completed checks with the intent to defraud (§ 475, subd. (a)), and one count of possessing a forged check with the intent to defraud (§ 475). In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found defendant had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.