Ples Elworth Russell and Roy Russell v. United States

Good Law
308 F.2d 78·1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 1962Misc. 1481California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pies Elworth Russell has filed with the Chief Judge of this Court (a) a “Motion for Probation of Sentence,” invoking jurisdiction under Title 28, United States Code §§ 1291 and 1651(a), and (b) a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum,” in support of (a) above, invoking jurisdiction under Title 28 United States Code § 2241 .

Pies Elworth Russell purportedly files both his motion and his petition on behalf of Roy Russell as well. Pies El-worth Russell alone signed it. Pies El-worth Russell is allegedly confined at the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, and Roy Russell at a federal institution at Terminal Island, San Pedro, California.

Both the motion and the petition have been referred by the Chief Judge to this panel of the Court.

A litigant appearing in propria persona has no authority to represent anyone other than himself. Cf. Carrigan v. California State Legislature et al., 9 Cir., 263 F.2d 560 . There is, therefore, no matter presently before us presented by, or on behalf of, Roy Russell.

We turn to Pies Russell.

Title 28 of the United States Code § 1291 gives this Court jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.