National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Lithographers Of America (Ind.)
Opinion
Opinion
309 F.2d 31 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AMALGAMATED LITHOGRAPHERS OF AMERICA (IND.) and Local No. 17 of theAmalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.), Respondents, Lithographers andPrinters National Association, Employing Lithographers Association, a Divisionof the Graphic ArtsEmployers Association, Intervenors. No. 17410. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 31, 1962, Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1962. Stuart Roghman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, and Morton Namrow, Attys., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. 1 Robinson, Silberman, Pearce & Aronsohn, Benjamin M. Robinson, Matthew Silverman, and Leonard B. Sand, New York City, for respondents, Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.) and Local 17, Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.). 2 Garry, Dreyfus, McTernan & Keller, and Francis J. McTernan, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent, Local 17, Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.). 3 Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C., for intervenor Lithographers & Printers Nat. Assn. Inc. 4 Littler, Mendelson, & Saltzman, and Robert Littler, San…