Bonanno v. Thomas

Good Law
309 F.2d 320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 196217630California1,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

309 F.2d 320 Salvatore V. BONANNO, Appellant, v. Charles THOMAS, Gordon Selby, Leon Orr, Charles Hodges, Don Rust, Harold Harrett, John Doe Bingaman, John Doe Bentz, John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III, John Doe IV, John Doe V, Richard Roe I, Richard Roe II, Richard Roe III, Richard Roe IV, and Richard Roe V, Appellees. No. 17630. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 25, 1962. Dominic H. Frinzi, Milwaukee, Wis., Paul H. Primock, and W. T. Elsing and Francis R. Crable, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellant. Merle L. Hansen, City Atty., Leven B. Ferrin, Asst. City Atty., Gibbons, Kinney & Tipton, Phoenix, Ariz., Faulkner, Sheehan & Wiseman, and Harold C. Faulkner, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before ORR, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge. 1 Salvatore V. Bonanno appeals, in part, from a district court judgment dismissing his first amended complaint in this civil rights damage suit, and dismissing the action. 2 The suit was commenced on May 3, 1961. The City of Phoenix, Arizona, the chief of police of that city, and two detective lieutenants of Phoenix were named as defendants. Defendants filed and noticed for hearing a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.