No. 17657

Good Law
309 F.2d 452
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 1962452California1,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

309 F.2d 452 Peter HOLZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,* Respondent. * Under the new statute ( Public Law 87-301, 75 Stat. 651, 8 U.S.C. 1105a(a)(3)) actions of this type must be brought against the Immigration and Naturalization Service as Respondent. We have, therefore, changed the title of proceedings in this Court from 'Peter Holz, Petitioner v. George Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization, etc., et al., Respondents' to 'Peter Holz, Petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent'. No. 17657. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 1, 1962. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Section, James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Dzintra I. Janavs, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge. 1 This is a petition for judicial review of the Immigration and Naturalization Service's (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent') denial of an application for stay of deportation made by Peter Holz (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner') under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.