Picklesimer

People v. Picklesimer

Bad Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 239·2010 Cal. LEXIS 1893·48 Cal. 4th 330·226 P.3d 348·63 A.L.R. 6th 819
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 15, 2010S165680California5,134 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

In People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1207 [ 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 821 , 129 P.3d 29 ] {Hofsheier), we concluded imposition of mandatory lifetime sex offender registration on defendants convicted of violations of Penal Code section 288a, subdivision (b)(1) for voluntary oral copulation with a 16- or 17-year-old minor violated the state and federal equal protection clauses. Our decision resulted in the creation of a class of people, those convicted of violating section 288a, subdivision (b)(1) on or before the date of our decision, who potentially might be entitled to relief from mandatory lifetime registration but for whom the precise procedural method of asserting such a claim for relief was uncertain. We resolve that uncertainty here.

We conclude that for those like defendant Andrew Nelson Picklesimer, who are no longer in custody and whose appeals are final, claims for Hofsheier relief—relief from mandatory lifetime sex offender registration based on equal protection—must be brought by way of a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court. A freestanding postjudgment motion for Hofsheier relief, such as the one Picklesimer filed, is not cognizable, as the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.