City of Barstow v. Mojave Water Agency

Bad Law
2000 Cal. LEXIS 6115·2000 Daily Journal DAR 9265·23 Cal. 4th 1224·99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 294·5 P.3d 853
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 21, 2000S071728California11,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

I. Introduction

We granted review to determine whether a trial court may definitively resolve water right priorities in an overdrafted basin with a “physical solution” that relies on the equitable apportionment doctrine but does not consider the affected owners’ legal water rights in the basin. We conclude it may not, and affirm the Court of Appeal judgment in that respect. In the second part of this opinion, we address whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the trial court abused its discretion when it determined that a water producer who desired to stipulate to the physical solution was fairly apportioned its share of water. We conclude the Court of Appeal erred on this point. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part the Court of Appeal judgment.

II. Background

The Mojave River originates in the San Bernardino Mountains, where rain and snow runoff give rise to the West Fork of the Mojave River and Deep Creek. These tributaries join at the mountain foothills in an area called The Forks to form the Mojave River. From The Forks, the Mojave River flows approximately 90 miles north to Victorville and Helendale, northeast to Barstow, east to Afton, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.