In Re EJ

Caution
104 Cal. Rptr. 3d 165·47 Cal. 4th 1258·223 P.3d 31
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2010S156933, S157631, S157633, S157634California15,925 words

Opinion

Opinion

On November 7, 2006, the voters enacted Proposition 83, The Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica's Law (Prop. 83, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2006); hereafter Proposition 83 or Jessica's Law). Proposition 83 was a wide-ranging initiative intended to "help Californians better protect themselves, their children, and their communities" ( id., § 2, subd. (f)) from problems posed by sex offenders by "strengthen[ing] and improv[ing] the laws that punish and control sexual offenders" ( id., § 31).

Among other revisions to the Penal Code, [1] Proposition 83 amended section 3003.5, a statute setting forth restrictions on where certain sex offenders subject to the lifetime registration requirement of section 290 [2] may reside. New subdivision (b), added to section 3003.5, provides: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is unlawful for any person for whom registration is required pursuant to Section 290 to reside within 2000 feet of any public or private school, or park where children regularly gather." (§ 3003.5, subd. (b) (section 3003.5(b)).) The new residency restrictions took effect on November 8, 2006, the effective date of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.