Marshall

Lee v. Marshall

Caution
843 F. Supp. 608·1993 WL 572322·1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19149
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1993CV 93-0224 JSLCalifornia3,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Letts, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

The Court further notes that the intrusion into the jury room was done without the knowledge of the trial judge, and that the trial judge was put in the position of having to accept the self-serving statements of the intruders as to what transpired while they were in the jury room. The Court believes that such statements are an insufficient basis for the conclusion that the intrusion was harmless.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition filed herein is hereby GRANTED, and that Respondent have 60 days in which to institute a new trial or order Petitioner’s release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the order herein by United States mail on Petitioner, counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

THIS ORDER SHALL BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

FINAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.