Wright

Wright v. Craven

Good Law
325 F. Supp. 1253·1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14029
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 197150677California437 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wollenberg, J.

ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

An “habitch” in California prison parlance is an inmate subject to a mandatory life sentence following a finding of habitual criminality as defined by Calif.Pen.Code, § 644(b).

Petitioner is an “habitch”. A 1962 information, charging him with various offenses including robbery and carrying a concealed weapon, also recited six prior convictions suffered by him. Petitioner admitted the priors, following which a jury found him guilty of the principal offenses. On January 16, 1963, petitioner was sentenced as a recidivist.

At no time prior to sentencing was petitioner apprised in open court that he could be convicted as a recidivist. The information did not invoke § 644 (b), and petitioner’s admission was taken without any reference to the fact that it left him open to a finding of habitual criminality. On the day of judgment, this finding was made and petitioner was sentenced to the term “prescribed by law”. The term prescribed by Calif.Pen.Code. § 644(b) is imprisonment for life.

Petitioner alleges that his admission of the priors was the equivalent of a plea of guilty, that the plea was taken without any notice of the recidivism charge or of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.