Reliance Insurance v. McGrath

Good Law
671 F. Supp. 669·1987 A.M.C. 1916·1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9133
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1987C 84-7279 TEHCalifornia4,826 words

Opinion

Opinion

Henderson, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Reliance Insurance Company brought this action against its insured, Bryant G. McGrath, seeking declaratory judgment that it is not liable, under a marine insurance policy that it issued to the defendant, for the damage claimed to have been sustained by the insured yacht, MY MISTRESS II. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 , 1333. The case was tried without a jury. Based on the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, I conclude that plaintiff is not liable for the claimed loss, and the defendant McGrath should take nothing by way of his cross-complaint.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and is licensed to do business and is doing business in the State of California as an insurer.

2. Bryant G. McGrath (“McGrath”) is a citizen of the State of California residing in Menlo Park, California. McGrath was the insured under a standard All-Risk Marine Yacht Insurance Policy, Number YH5262805, issued by Reliance under certain terms and conditions against loss of or damage to his 37-foot wood Chris Craft motorboat named MY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.