Jack Rainsberger v. Ralph Lamb, Sheriff, Clark County, Nevada

Good Law
313 F.2d 195·1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6307
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 196318162_1California925 words

Opinion

Opinion

Magruder, J.

This is a habeas corpus case. It started as a criminal charge of murder lodged against appellant in the Eighth Judicial District Court in and for the County of Clark, State of Nevada. At the time of the hearing the applicable statute read that “ * * * if such person shall be convicted on confession in open court, the court shall proceed, by examination of witnesses, to determine the degree of the crime and give sentence accordingly.” N.R.S. 200.030, subsection 2. Notwithstanding the burden which this law placed upon the district judge, appellant having pleaded guilty to the charge of murder, after the hearing the judge determined that appellant was guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced him to death in the gas chamber.

The district judge remonstrated with the legislature that no judge should by himself have the responsibility of sentencing a man to death. The legislature obliged him by amending the relevant statute so as to read: “ * * * If any person is convicted of murder on his confession in open court without a jury, or upon a plea of guilty without specification of a degree, the supreme court shall appoint two district judges from judicial districts other than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.